Our expertise

A score out of 100 per asset, across eleven markets, recomputed every day. What sets it apart is not the score: it is that one click shows where each point comes from, indicator by indicator, with the sentence that explains the zone you are in. A score you cannot open is a black box.

About twenty technical indicators, five families of financial ratios, and a slider that decides their respective weight. The same company can be a good case and a bad moment: the platform lets you choose which of the two questions you are asking, instead of deciding for you.

Strength and momentum by sector, relative rotation quadrants, a cyclical or defensive phase. With a dedicated backtest that checks the mechanism really predicts something, and whose verdict is shown on the screen itself. The article explains the principle.

Getting exposure to oil can be done through a futures contract, a listed fund, or a share in the sector. Those do not carry the same fees, the same tax treatment, or the same behaviour. We compare the vehicles of one exposure, not just holdings against one another. None of the comparable tools listed on our comparison page does this.

Positions, dividends, fees, gains and losses consolidated in your currency. Import of a broker statement with no formatting beforehand, loss-threshold alerts computed on each holding's own volatility, and a screen that answers "how many euros do I put on this line" with the exact rule that was tested.

The real-estate module simulates a buy-to-let acquisition strategy over several years: borrowing capacity, cash flow, comparison of tax regimes, stress test. Same account, same demand for transparency about the assumptions.

The number of assets tracked comes from a database query, not an estimate. Backtest results are recomputed. When a figure is missing, the screen leaves it blank and says why, instead of putting a zero that would read as a measurement.

The bonus tied to news sentiment had existed for a long time without ever being checked. We measured it, and the result narrowed its scope instead of widening it. A mechanism that does not survive its own measurement should be removed, not defended.

What our backtest does not say sets out six limits of our own simulation, including a real bug found in production and what it cost.

A questionnaire works out your level, and the interface adjusts: fewer columns, words instead of acronyms, lessons a click away. They are the same figures for everyone, presented differently. Simplifying is not amputating.